Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) vs Ruud RUTGH-CS11I

The Ruud RUTGH-CS11I is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.96 versus 0.95 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $255/year for the Ruud RUTGH-CS11I against $258/year for the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) — a $3 annual difference. The Ruud RUTGH-CS11I sustains the higher flow (5.8 GPM vs 4.8 GPM under the DOE test).

Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) Ruud RUTGH-CS11I
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.95 0.96
Fuel Natural Gas, Propane Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.8 GPM 5.8 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 178 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 160 kBTU/h 199 kBTU/h
Max current draw 5 A 2 A
Vent type Power Vent, Power Direct Vent Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 98 % 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 1 GPM 0.4 GPM
Annual propane use 194.53 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 3 / 2 2
Width 17 in 18.1 in
Depth 16 in 13.6 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) or the Ruud RUTGH-CS11I?

The Ruud RUTGH-CS11I: about $255/year versus $258/year for the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) at national average rates — a $3 annual difference.

Are the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) and Ruud RUTGH-CS11I both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.