Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) vs Midea JSG40-24PCH-LP

Both water heaters carry the same efficiency rating: UEF 0.95. At national average rates that works out to about $258/year for the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) against $522/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-LP — a $264 annual difference. The Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) sustains the higher flow (4.8 GPM vs 4.4 GPM under the DOE test).

Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) Midea JSG40-24PCH-LP
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.95 0.95
Fuel Natural Gas, Propane Propane
Max flow rate 4.8 GPM 4.4 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 178 therms/yr 177 therms/yr
Gas input rate 160 kBTU/h 150 kBTU/h
Max current draw 5 A 1.1 A
Vent type Power Vent, Power Direct Vent Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 98 % 0.96 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 1 GPM 0.5 GPM
Annual propane use 194.53 gal/yr 193.44 gal/yr
Vent size 3 / 2 2 / 3
Height 26.8 in
Width 17 in 17.3 in
Depth 16 in 11 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) or the Midea JSG40-24PCH-LP?

The Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1): about $258/year versus $522/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-LP at national average rates — a $264 annual difference.

Are the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) and Midea JSG40-24PCH-LP both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.